Health Inspector
Uploaded by: texteditor
Video Description:
Incident in Indiana where a health inspector trespasses on private property while law enforcement looks on.
Tags for this video: Freedom Health Indiana Inspector Law Liberty Martial Property Rights Sheriff Tyranny
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by texteditor
| The Health Inspector | crazy people jumping | Crazy Falls and idiot people |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| The Death Road | my crazy people - tv & radio stars - jackson / shakira | Bull run in pamplona crazy people |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














Reading my posts will show that I have never implied any such thing, and reading Dunn will show that you have no legal basis for your claims. Of course, I suppose that it's entirely predictable that one who defends government abuse would do so by resorting to logical fallacies and lies.
Inspection of private property;
Sec. 23. (a) Except as provided in subsection (b), the local health officer or the officer's designee may enter upon and inspect private property, at proper times after due notice, in regard to the possible presence, source, and cause of disease. The local health officer or designee may order what is reasonable and necessary for prevention and suppression of disease and in all reasonable and necessary ways protect the public health.
What's your point of pasting an Indiana Code? Do you think local codes nullify Constitutional Amendments? Or maybe you think a vague term like "due notice" replaces "due process". HA!
Julie Wolfe
809 State St. Suite 401A Laporte, In 46350
(219)326-6808 ext 200.
Fax (219)325-8628
DEPUTY CADE COOPER
SERVING SINCE 2004
Address: 809 State Street Suite 202A
LaPorte, Indiana 46350
Phone LaPorte Office Number: 219-326-7700
Julie Wolfe
809 State St. Suite 401A Laporte, In 46350
(219)326-6808 ext 200.
Fax (219)325-8628
Enjoy the gruel in the camps, pal.
Why should they care what people who do not understand the law think of them?
And who exactly are you claiming does "not understand the law"?
Your references would appear to be hollow.
Listen to the way he is talking. It says it all.
What "way"? "All" of what? Please explain yourself.
You, zhuliu, among others do not understand the law, as other people who have read those laws realize.
You will no doubt respond with a further demonstration of your lack of understanding.
As I have already refuted, and you have already conceded: the four factors for consideration in Dunn are not conjunctive requirements. Why do you persist with purveying what you know to be false? You have essentially acknowledged that one factor would be sufficient (a solid fence) and that the property owner complies with one (close proximity to the residence).