Two Women
Uploaded by: StuartBrowning
Video Description:
Filmmakers Browning & Greenberg shows that having the government determine health care priorities can have unfortunate consequences.
Tags for this video: canada care health healthcare Michael Moore politics Sicko single-payer solution
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by StuartBrowning
| Watch a drawing as it happens. Two women in bed. | sexy hot women kissing in the house | scene de concubinage lesbiens |
 |  |  |
| Love Between Two Women | Women struggle with Sex Addiction too. | Dead Meat |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
I gave up luxuries until I could afford them again.
The government just runs the insurance, and that is mandatory.
It's a great system.
Sure, it sucks things are politicized, where a politician will meet with a tranny just to be politically correct, but c'est la vie. That'll happen as long as we have politicians.
In any case, you are free to apply at a cooperative if you think working for others is lame. That's entirely your choice, and nobody is stopping you.
The great thing about Marxists is that they have to tell people where *their own* interests lay. Now that's irony.
They're still regulated to death, the prices are set for them and they're told which patients they must accept. It's not a free market by any stretch of the word.
Yet, in your mind, if 51% of the people all come to me and tell me to give them my money (under the threat of gov't force), then it's ok with you. You support legalized, government-sponsored theft because you're too selfish and lazy to fix the problem on your own
I have no responsibilities except for myself. Saying I have to care for my children is a red herring because those children are people I brought into this world by choice. I have no responsibility to take care of your or anyone else.
If *YOU* feel a responsibility to do so, DO SO, but don't you dare try to make ME pay for it and act like that's somehow compassionate of you. It's nothing but legalized theft
No, it's hegemony.
I'm not a Marxist, by the way. I'm a libertarian socialist. But yes I am enthusiastic about the liberation of humankind.
What a bleak ideology!
Our common law recognizes that you have responsibilities to strangers. If you see a man bleeding to death in the street, you have a responsibility to help, for example. Protecting the weak is what humans should do. In hunter-gatherer societies it is common sense: you help to raise other people's children, not just your own, and you share with elders simply because they need it. That's the true human nature.
If you want to help others, be my guest. But again, DON'T USE THE GUNS OF GOVERNMENT TO MAKE ME DO WHAT YOU THINK I SHOULD AND THEN PRETEND THAT **YOU** ARE BEING COMPASSIONATE. Be compassionate without using government violence.
However, that shouldn't hide the fact that I think regulations can potentially be a good thing, and not just a bad thing as you imply, given your "regulated to death" remark.
My point is that we all must help each other. Just as my man-dying-in-the-street example works, you are obligated to help others. If you agree with the law (backed by guns, I guess, if you insist on boiling it down to that for dramatic effect) that a citizen can't legally walk past a dying man on the street, why doesn't that also apply to a man dying of a disease who can't afford health care?
Then do it. But don't use a the guns of government to steal from others and redistribute and then act like you're "helping." You're not, anymore than any other theief.
If your compassion is real, and I doubt it is, lower your standard of living and give your OWN money. Don't give away mine.
I guess when your argument isn't working on its own, cheap shots ease the pain.
Saying "Then do it" doesn't answer my point. Our law *obliges* you to help a stranger bleeding to death on the street. That is a good law, and an example of how you *do* have responsibilities to strangers. If that is accepted, then further responsibilities are plausible. How do you answer that?
But I agree in the sense that this basic level of fellow responsibility justifies a basis for socialism.
i would rather pay on a 500,000 dollar debt every month for the rest of my life than to have to wait 3 years for a necessary surgery.
people need to wake up... socialism (read communism) does not work! if you want real change we should be looking into libertarianism. the only political philosophy i know that has real plans for both peace and prosperity.