Fuck Fox "News" 37: "Science Books Are Wrong About Evolution"
Uploaded by: C0ct0pusPrime
Video Description:
the discovery institute can discover my nuts.
get your c0ct0-shit & Help me fix my extremely painful teeth...
Store 1: http://www.cafepress.com/C0ct0pus
Store 2: http://www.cafepress.com/C0ct0pus3
Store 3: http://www.cafepress.com/C0ct0pus2
special requests considered...
art for sale also, just message me. art: http://s664.photobucket.com/albums/vv8/c0ct0pus/
Donations are also appreciated :)
PayPal email is c0ct0pus@hotmail.com
Tags for this video: fuck fox news 37 and friends evolution debate discovery institute creationist in disguise trying to raise doubt science books text darwin atheist atheism religion god christianity conservative republican right wing left liberal democrat c0ct0pus c0ct0pusprime
Find more videos in the "Nonprofit" category
See more videos uploaded by C0ct0pusPrime
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















And much thanks to Thunderf00t for that series.
By far the funniest thing I've seen in weeks.
How anyone can take that think tank seriously is beyond me.
And if you want to talk about "punching holes" in theories, the bible contradicts itself continuously throughout it's shoddy text. Don't believe me? Then I swear i will destroy your argument if you contradict. Go on I fucking dare you. I got contradictions a'waitin'!
hahahahahhahaa
yeh not based on peer reviewed science at all XD
it's all a liberal conspiracy isnt it ROFL
Obscufacation of the facts, etc. etc. etc. "
"Usually based on long disproved science" - peer review makes that close to impossible :)
"lack of good evidence for Darwinism" - sorry, but we ascribe to modern evolutionary synthesis not 'Darwinism'.
"peppered moths" - remain evidence of evolution they have never been debunked.
"embryology" - is a legitimate science
"faked transitional forms' - ARE NOT IN THE TEXTBOOKS however valid ones are.
"Mendelism" - was reconciled with evolutionary synthesis in the 1920's!!!!
i can only assume that your reference to embryology being wrong is an indirect reference to Heckels embryos which were an example of fraud, something you might not be familiar with however is WHY they were fraud. they OVEREMPHASIZED the similarities, but to say that there are no similarities there is an outright lie.
"unclear definitions of common words" - such as?
"Obscufacation of the facts" - the only one who is obscuring the facts appears to be you are yet to demonstrate one credible thing that is wrong with evolution.
Some one with some scientific credential may lead the team. To give the appearance of credibility.
For the most, I'll stick by my statement. "They are all part of the secular humanist misinformation, delusional, campaign to live a fairy tail life. Where men are their own gods."