Creation Astronomy



Uploaded by: MadScience
Video Description:
www.answersingenesis.org
Creation Astronomy Seminar by Dr. Jason Lisle,
Ph.D.
Dr. Lisle graduated summa cum laude from Ohio Wesleyan University where he double-majored in physics and astronomy, and minored in mathematics. He did graduate work at the University of Colorado where he earned a Master's degree and a Ph.D. in Astrophysics. While there, Dr. Lisle used the SOHO spacecraft to investigate motions on the surface of the sun as well as solar magnetism and subsurface weather. His thesis was entitled "Probing the Dynamics of Solar Supergranulation and its Interaction with Magnetism." He has also authored a number of papers in both secular and creation literature.


Tags for this video: astronomy bible creation creationscience earth genesis heavens jesus moon nebula science solar stars truth universe

Find more videos in the "Tech" category
See more videos uploaded by MadScience

Related Videos
Planetarium at the Creation MuseumThe Light of Creation vs the Darkness of EvolutionEvidence for God from Physics & Astronomy_Lee Strobel
planetarium-at-the-creation-museum.htmlplanetarium-at-the-creation-museum.htmlplanetarium-at-the-creation-museum.html
Creation AstronomyYoung Earth Creation and AstronomyFor The Atheist, Agnostic, And Satanist: The Final Word
planetarium-at-the-creation-museum.htmlplanetarium-at-the-creation-museum.htmlplanetarium-at-the-creation-museum.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
Jason Lisle seems ... ( 1 month ago by missiontalk)
Jason Lisle seems like real smart guy. I seen a debate which places between him and astronomer Hugh Ross. He totally smoked Ross. It was pretty awesome.
"I seen a debate... ... ( 1 month ago by timjhnsn)
"I seen a debate..." Your grammar skills speak well of your credibility.
"Your grammar ... ( 4 weeks ago by kut77less)
"Your grammar skills speak well of your credibility. "
What has his comment has to do anything with is grammar
No, his comment ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
No, his comment wasnt grammar-related, but it exhibited poor grammar. You might want to re-read yours as well, and see if it makes sense. Although I sense your errors are just typos due to a lack of proofreading, which I understand.
My point is this- ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
My point is this- Jason Lisle is a smart guy, probably a lot smarter than you or I. Now we have two choices, a) we can simply be blown away by his knowledge, or b) we can take what we do have in our toolkit to critically approach his work. Our language skills give us an ability to deconstruct what someone is saying. While we may still have to research terms and phrases, language deconstruction will go a long way toward forming an opinion, and, hopefully learning a bit more.
Since missiontalk ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
Since missiontalk doesnt have any doctoral-level astrophysics credentials (based on his profile) then Im left to look at his grammar as an indicator as to how well he might do at deconstructing someones words. His use of seen rather than saw suggests he would not fare well. So the anecdotal, I like the way the smart man talks type of statements dont help anyone else to regard Jason Lisle any higher.
I could be wrong
Array ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
Tim,
Thank you for your constructive criticism in regards to my grammer skills. For some reason I assumed that I was among friends. At the time I wrote that statement I was in a hurry and quite lax in my language skills. I do not claim to have any background in Astro-physics. I am history/anthropology major and bones are my cup of tea. My comment was not meant to be taken as an addition to the conversation but rather a general comment. I about something I had seen concerning Jason.
"I about something ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
"I about something I had seen concerning Jason. " Please consider the following as a correction.
My comment was not meant to be taken as an addition to the conversation but rather a general comment about something I had seen concerning Jason.
Allow me to respond ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
Allow me to respond to this ridiculous,and unfounded comment. First of all, who do you think you are? Do you have a college degree or are you an "armchair philosopher?" Furthermore, does one need a "doctorate level" degree to casually enjoy the works of another man? I am a junior in college who has enjoyed a very fruitful academic career, even making "Who's Who among American Junior Colleges" last year.
I am certain not ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
I am certain not going to have a self-proclamed hack sit here and try to pawn me off as some kool-aid drinking hillbilly with the sense God gave a mule. Get over yourself friend.
"self-proclaimed ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
"self-proclaimed hack" would mean that I called myself a hack.
I do, in fact, have ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
I do, in fact, have a masters degree, but that is not the point. I am not suggesting you can't enjoy it without a doctoral degree, but I would question how you could say someone was owned if you dont know enough about the subject matter. If Jason is a better debater it still doesnt make what he says true. Can you think of anyone in history who was able to convince people of a lie?
I guess the beauty ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
I guess the beauty of youtube is the freedom of a difference of opinion. In the public sphere, not everyone is your friend. I do understand being lax with language and do accept that as a reasonable explanation.
And I would hope ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
And I would hope God gave you the sense of a mule... and then some.
First of all, I do ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
First of all, I do not have a problem with you calling my grammer skills into question. Sincerly, I offer my thanks. I will be sharper in the time ahead. I understand that Jason can be wrong in his ideas as well. I have a problem with the manner in which you made an assessment about my intelligence based on a single finding. That is not scientific. I have a problem with the fact that you continued to drag out over three posts. I think we are on the same team. Give me a chance.
sorry I knew it was ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
sorry I knew it was wrong when I wrote it. To tell you the truth I was little pieved.
"I would question ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
"I would question how you could say someone was owned if you dont know enough about the subject matter."
Whether or not Jason is telling truth has nothing to do with the fact that he "owned" Hugh Ross. Jason might be full of baloney for all I know. However, Ross could not keep things together and continued to stumble over everything Jason was laying out. When Jason called him into question, he could not provide good answers. I think anybody can appreciate that.
Youre right, it ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
Youre right, it wasnt scientific, nor was I touting it as a scientific conclusion (note my use of the words suggests and indicator in my post). Speaks to your credibility was meant simply to imply that it is an anecdotal observation. Scientific conclusions arent reached by these types of observations, but hypotheses are.
Whats my point? ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
Whats my point? YouTube is a public sphere. Some folks do tout the straw man that creationists are hillbillies as you suggested, and articulacy and grammar help refute that claim. The opposite, however, only promotes the stereotype. For the record, I do not believe you are a hillbilly.
So a judge should ... ( 4 weeks ago by timjhnsn)
So a judge should take into an account which attorney was the better orator when considering a case? To be fair, it sounds like we have different definitions of what it means to own or smoke something or someone. I will admit I can be swayed by the better speaker... I am easily wooed.
Thank you. I do not ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
Thank you. I do not think you are a hack either. Look you have a degree and I can appreciate that. You seem like a smart guy. I understand your point and I stand corrected for being a monkey. Even someone who is not an astro-physicist knows that you made a hypothesis. I am willing to call a truce about this.
That is true and I ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
That is true and I will take that into account. However, my point is that if a person who is being debated cannot answer the questions that are being asked him than I consider him to be losing. Now, it does not mean that Hugh was right or wrong. All I am saying is that he did not have feasible answers to compete with Jason. That is bad debating in any field... At least I think so.
Also, I want to ... ( 4 weeks ago by missiontalk)
Also, I want to note that I respect Hugh Ross and his standing in the world of science. He is actually better speaker than Jason. Jason gave concise answers to questions, and Hugh danced around it hoping to avoid it. When Jason asked for an answer from Hugh he basically dodged it. By the way, have you read any of Russell Humphrey's works? He has stirred up a lot of debate but his ideas are very unique and interesting to say the least.
Array ( 1 week ago by RationalEmotive)
Pi equals 3
(1 Kings 7:23)
I rest my case.



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code