@chillefect: On the Haeckel's embryo's thing, it looks like the argument has already ended. They don't use those drawings in new textbooks anymore, it's just that some old textbooks that are still in use still have them. The latest I know of is a 2003 edition. If the creationist arguments are reasonable in and of themselves, then they should be listened to. People should not just say "a creationist said it, therefore it's wrong."
1:45 that douche ...( 7 months ago by captain150)
1:45 that douche was pwned. And par for the course for Faux News, news for fucking retards, entertainment for the rest of us.
those parts with ...( 7 months ago by jzuidema)
those parts with the scientist and creationist going through textbooks in search of Haeckels drawings, are those part of an interview or program or something which is also accesible through youTube?
"Yeah they are ...( 7 months ago by greywolf424)
"Yeah they are still in modern textbooks. " BOLD FACED LIE.... POST THE TITLE OF THE BOOK AND ISBN OF THE BOOK. SAFE YOU SAY WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM YOU AGAIN.
Array( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
greywolf424: I don't know if that was directed at me, but Haeckel's fake embryo drawings are in modern textbooks. One example is Biology, Raven and Johnson 6th edition, 2002. I don't know what the ISBN is for that, but it might not be to hard to find out.
Array( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
captain150: It's really the other way around. Randy Olson was pwned beause he was later forced to admit that Haeckel's embryos are in modern textbooks. Just beause they weren't in the group that John Calvert had doesn't mean they're not in some.
Also type ...( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
Also type Intelligent Design/Evolution Debate (2 of 8) into the search field and start watching at seven minutes and 47 seconds. Ken Miller admits on camera that Haeckel's embryos were in his textbook and that they are wrong. This guy is very much oppossed to creationism, so why would he admit that they're were in his textbook if they were not?
"so why would he ...( 6 months ago by greywolf424)
"so why would he admit that they're were in his textbook if they were not? " YOU'RE LYING
Array( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
greywolf424: I guess you're joking here, but if you're not, then you really are making a mockery of yourself. Just check out the example that I mentioned.
I did, and as usual ...( 6 months ago by greywolf424)
I did, and as usual for creationist low life fucks... YOU WERE DISTORTING FACTS
Oh and bottom line, ...( 6 months ago by greywolf424)
Oh and bottom line, it doesn't change the FACT these two videos explain quite clearly and demonstrate how creationists will commit fraud and perjury to advance their agenda. watch?v=PMLBc-IFyes watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSg
No matter what you ...( 6 months ago by greywolf424)
No matter what you post I will never buy into your bullshit cult and I will fight to my last breath to see it abolished.
Array( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
greywolf424: You sound a lot like a religious fanatic to me.
And yeah, with ...( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
And yeah, with those two examples it does show that creationists have lied, but that has nothing to do with what we're discussing here.
So? Let's say it is ...( 6 months ago by captain150)
So? Let's say it is in ONE textbook. Who gives a damn? Notice how scientists admit when they are wrong? I have almost never seen a creationist do that. Where was that cunt Bill Buckingham's admission of guilt for all his lies and manipulation?
Array( 6 months ago by Mortison77577)
captain150: Actually, a few scientists have had a hard time admitting that they were wrong, but what's really scary are people like greywolf424 who refuse to admit that they're wrong no matter what. If people claim to stand for science they should rise above what the creationists do.
Array( 6 months ago by ChristJesusReigns)
@greywolf424 You can't buy into a cult because you're already in one.
Array( 6 months ago by ChristJesusReigns)
@captain150 Are you a CREATure? And if you say yes, can you tell me what the 1st definition of CREATure is via Merriam Webster's online dictionary?
When is religion ...( 4 months ago by mrx0066600)
When is religion going to fuck off...
Poor creationists. ...( 4 months ago by nummulite99)
Poor creationists. Wrong wrong wrong. They really ought to do their research properly before they try to attack well established scientific principals. They really need to educate themselves. The Discovery Institute. That's an oxy moron if ever there was one. And Fox news...shame on you for giving these fools air time.
I'm 40 and was ...( 4 months ago by Kentagerna)
I'm 40 and was taught "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny" I don't know how many times by the time I got my college degree - complete with Haekle's drawings. This Olson guy is like someone out of Orwell's 1984. He should find a "Ministry of Truth" to get a job with (unless that's who he's working for now....)
1:48 " ...( 3 months ago by Mrxb0x)
1:48 "ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh shit "
Creationists status ...( 3 months ago by EresTremulent)
Creationists status: [ ] Told [x] Fucking told
Anyone notice the ...( 2 months ago by benthemiester)
On the Haeckel's embryo's thing, it looks like the argument has already ended. They don't use those drawings in new textbooks anymore, it's just that some old textbooks that are still in use still have them. The latest I know of is a 2003 edition. If the creationist arguments are reasonable in and of themselves, then they should be listened to. People should not just say "a creationist said it, therefore it's wrong."
And par for the course for Faux News, news for fucking retards, entertainment for the rest of us.
BOLD FACED LIE.... POST THE TITLE OF THE BOOK AND ISBN OF THE BOOK.
SAFE YOU SAY WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM YOU AGAIN.
I don't know if that was directed at me, but Haeckel's fake embryo drawings are in modern textbooks. One example is Biology, Raven and Johnson 6th edition, 2002. I don't know what the ISBN is for that, but it might not be to hard to find out.
It's really the other way around. Randy Olson was pwned beause he was later forced to admit that Haeckel's embryos are in modern textbooks. Just beause they weren't in the group that John Calvert had doesn't mean they're not in some.
YOU'RE LYING
I guess you're joking here, but if you're not, then you really are making a mockery of yourself. Just check out the example that I mentioned.
watch?v=PMLBc-IFyes
watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSg
You sound a lot like a religious fanatic to me.
Notice how scientists admit when they are wrong? I have almost never seen a creationist do that. Where was that cunt Bill Buckingham's admission of guilt for all his lies and manipulation?
Actually, a few scientists have had a hard time admitting that they were wrong, but what's really scary are people like greywolf424 who refuse to admit that they're wrong no matter what. If people claim to stand for science they should rise above what the creationists do.
You can't buy into a cult because you're already in one.
Are you a CREATure? And if you say yes, can you tell me what the 1st definition of CREATure is via Merriam Webster's online dictionary?
[ ] Told
[x] Fucking told