Science Vs. Casey Luskin (Haeckels Embryos, Fox News)
Uploaded by: freedom0f5peech
Video Description:
Clips of Randy Olson's film (Flock of Dodo's) destroying Casey Luskin's dishonest argument.
See Flock of Dodo's here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czo56z1C1nA
DonExodus2 Destroys Casey Luskin Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8FajAkmaswc
C0ct0pusPrime Destroys Casey Luskin Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eoXsqGOG3go
Music:
Chopin Etude Op.25 no.9
Tags for this video: Haeckels Embryos Fox News Randy Olson Casey Luskin Flock Of Dodos Discovery Institute Evolution Science Atheist Atheists Atheism
Find more videos in the "Education" category
See more videos uploaded by freedom0f5peech
| Re: 'Casey Luskin: The scientists are wrong' | Banana Man Fails Again (Atheist Nightmare) | Discovery Institute - Casey Luskin - Ignorance or something else? |
 |  |  |
| Casey Luskin lies about teaching of evolution | Why do people laugh at creationists? (part 30) | Intelligent Design and AIDS Denialism: What do they have in common? |
 |  |  |
Share This Video:
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
Yeah they are still in modern textbooks.
Not necessarily. A group of Texas creationists was happy with just removing the pictures as far as I know. But arguments should be evaluated on the basis of their own merits, not the people who make them.
true. but what I'm saying is that when is the argument of what should be in the biology books really going to end? and the majority of the arguments are from creationist. that can't be denied. To argue about what something is and have it taken out of a book because it might not be true is a good thing. but to argue about something cause it contradicts what you believe and not based on facts is what really is going on in the biology book battles.
Not that it really matters anyway. This is just another case of straw-grasping by the creationists.
funny thing is the churches want creationism "taught" in school, I wonder if they would be so open to evolution taught in churches taught in
On the Haeckel's embryo's thing, it looks like the argument has already ended. They don't use those drawings in new textbooks anymore, it's just that some old textbooks that are still in use still have them. The latest I know of is a 2003 edition. If the creationist arguments are reasonable in and of themselves, then they should be listened to. People should not just say "a creationist said it, therefore it's wrong."
And par for the course for Faux News, news for fucking retards, entertainment for the rest of us.
BOLD FACED LIE.... POST THE TITLE OF THE BOOK AND ISBN OF THE BOOK.
SAFE YOU SAY WE WILL NEVER HEAR FROM YOU AGAIN.
I don't know if that was directed at me, but Haeckel's fake embryo drawings are in modern textbooks. One example is Biology, Raven and Johnson 6th edition, 2002. I don't know what the ISBN is for that, but it might not be to hard to find out.
It's really the other way around. Randy Olson was pwned beause he was later forced to admit that Haeckel's embryos are in modern textbooks. Just beause they weren't in the group that John Calvert had doesn't mean they're not in some.
YOU'RE LYING
I guess you're joking here, but if you're not, then you really are making a mockery of yourself. Just check out the example that I mentioned.
watch?v=PMLBc-IFyes
watch?v=JVRsWAjvQSg
You sound a lot like a religious fanatic to me.
Notice how scientists admit when they are wrong? I have almost never seen a creationist do that. Where was that cunt Bill Buckingham's admission of guilt for all his lies and manipulation?
Actually, a few scientists have had a hard time admitting that they were wrong, but what's really scary are people like greywolf424 who refuse to admit that they're wrong no matter what. If people claim to stand for science they should rise above what the creationists do.
Are you a CREATure? And if you say yes, can you tell me what the 1st definition of CREATure is via Merriam Webster's online dictionary?